Susan Sarandon & Hugo Weaving – Cloud Atlas

Published on February 13th, 2013

CLOUD ATLAS

SUSAN SARANDON (Madame Horrox, Older Ursula, Yusouf Suleiman, Abbess)

& HUGO WEAVING (Haskell Moore, Tadeusz Kesselring, Bill Smoke, Nurse Noakes, Boardman Mephi, Old Georgie) Q&A

TOM:  When you look in the mirror and see yourself in all that make-up, do you ever recognize yourself?

SUSAN SARANDON:  The only time in my life, and I’ve had lots of prosthetics in my life, that I have not recognized myself was when I had the Indian man make-up on.  And I think it was because of the contacts, really.  Because even in Enchanted, when I had the hag makeup, which hopefully didn’t look too much like myself, I had my own eyes.  In this, I wore contacts, which was the first time I’ve ever surrendered to the contact thing.  And, in fact, there were two teams of contact supervisors who just put the contacts in and took them out, there were so many flying around.

 

TOM:  Were each of your segments done in complete, or were there ever times when you were overlapping with other segments?

SUSAN SARANDON:  Are you kidding.  Take it, Hugo.

 

HUGO WEAVING:  No, unless you had a character that was just sort of there for a couple of scenes, and you did that on the one day, that was the only time that happened.  But, with a continuing character, absolutely not.  I think I started and ended the film with the same character.
SUSAN SARANDON:  But, you had one week where you did five or six characters.

 

HUGO WEAVING:  Yeah.  In one week sometimes you might be jumping from one to the other, from one day to the next.  But, in a funny way.  I mean, I’ve remarked on that, because I thought, ‘Oh, this is unusual.’  But, actually, when you’re doing it, on the day, you just focused on that one particular character and life and storyline.

 

SUSAN SARANDON:  It was more of a problem for the people who had to serve us up.  The scheduling and the makeup department was just moving.

 

HUGO WEAVING:  Imagine six totally different storylines, with all the actors playing in all of those stories, and then trying to schedule that.  It was an absolute nightmare and, of course, they said this schedule is set in stone; it can’t change.  And then Halle went and broke her ankle after two weeks and so the whole schedule changed quite regularly after that. But, it was pretty phenomenal the way they organized it.

 

TOM:  Did you use the multiple storylines as back stories to what you were playing, or were they all separate?

SUSAN SARANDON:  When you’re doing it, you’re not thinking outside of it, that metaphysical thing.  But, I think when you watch it, it’s quite clear that that’s what’s happening.  But, as Hugo said, you’re focusing completely on what you have to do that day and what that character knows and what that character wants.  It’s their job to leave it together.  Wouldn’t you say?

 

HUGO WEAVING:  Yeah, absolutely, you just focused on one thing on the day.  You can’t think about all the other characters.  But, having said that bit, prior to shooting, there was a sense with my six characters that there was definitely a journey, if you like, and a link between them.  They all seemed to have a similar sort of thrust, if you like.

 

So, there’s definitely a link between all of them, and a lot of them serve a similar sort of functional purpose within each story.

 

TOM:  Was there ever a moment where you were playing two characters in the same scene? 

HUGO WEAVING:  No.  The editing definitely does that.  So, you might leave one room and enter another as another character.  That’s certainly happened.  Or, there might be a line that you say that then obviously reverberates over something else that is pertinent to another one of your characters in another story.
SUSAN SARANDON:  And when they were assigning the characters to different actors, like Hugo’s all have one thrust.  And Tom starts out as this evil person and works his way through to redemption. Mine were all kind of spiritual, or more enlightened.

 

HUGO WEAVING:  So, in that way, the doing of it wasn’t radically different from day to day, because you’re just focusing on staying with it.

 

SUSAN SARANDON:  What was radically different was the ensemble spirit, the repertory spirit that you just don’t find in films, this kind of horizontal organization of power.  So, even the people that had big parts were playing little parts.  Everyone’s together in the trailer, and there’s this festive kind of Cirque du Soleil spirit.  Tattoos coming on and all the noses.

 

HUGO WEAVING:  It was very infectious.

 

SUSAN SARANDON:  And the bravery.  I got there mid-shoot and I was scared because I didn’t know what was happening.  And it was a different tone.  It was so festive and so brave and people just jumping from one thing to the next.  So all the egos were left outside and that’s very rare in a film.  You get it in theater, but you don’t have an opportunity, really, to experience that in a film.  That was such a gift, really.

 

HUGO WEAVING:  And when you have multiple characters, there’s less preciousness about one of them, because there are many. That’s kind of bright.

 

TOM:  Did you feel that even though you were playing such diverse characters that there was a through line and you were playing the soul of a person for over 500 years?

HUGO WEAVING:  I think intellectually I understood that that was certainly a theme and a concept.  And I certainly made a thread between all those souls, if you like, or that one soul.  But then, as we were saying, once that’s there, the experience of playing each one had to be separate.

 

They’re in their own lifetimes, not aware of their link to someone else, unless they were perhaps an enlightened character.

 

SUSAN SARANDON:  Who gets to say what the theme of the film is.

 

HUGO WEAVING:  Yeah.

 

SUSAN SARANDON:  But, I think the audience is the one that makes the connection.

 

HUGO WEAVING:  Yeah.

 

SUSAN SARANDON:  We had a special little screening in Chicago for the cast and some of the crew, and we could see it.  We were laughing at certain things.  But then we hit Toronto and having an audience made such a huge difference.  Hearing them laugh so hard and ooh and boo.  That was my opportunity to actually hear a lot of the phrases that are very subtly repeated.  And things that happen visually, I hadn’t caught a lot of it and I was glad that I saw it a second time, because I liked it even more, actually.

I appreciated their skill in dovetailing all the stories much more.  Because they could have just done them in blocks.  But this whole idea of a door closing, another one opening, literally, and watching how the music works and everything, I was able to appreciate a lot of it much more the second time.

 

TOM:  Do you have any personal feelings about the theme of the regeneration of the soul through different lifetimes and all of that? 

HUGO WEAVING:  I wouldn’t necessarily believe in reincarnation, but I certainly believe that all the actions that you take in your life stem from a belief, even if that belief is not conscious, even if it’s an instinctive sort of belief.  And those actions have an effect on other people around you, of course.  And then, those actions have reverberations into the future and can change people’s lives in the future.  So, I certainly believe in that sense of the cyclical nature of human life.

 

SUSAN SARANDON:  And I feel that how you spend your energy is how you create yourself.  Every day you have to be awake and aware and understand the ramifications and the reverberations.  And, at the same time, the people come into your life and jobs come into your life and children come into your life, that seems somehow to take you in a new direction that you maybe were longing for, but didn’t expect.  So, what you have to do is be flexible and awake, because certainly my life and the serendipity in my life is far more imaginative than I could have been if I had a plan.

I’m actually here because all my plans failed, so I celebrate that in this film.  It excites me, the serendipity of life.  It excites me the adventure that you don’t know what’s coming, from where it is, that will be handed up.  That’s up to you, then, to use.  That’s where the free will comes into it.

But if you’ve lost someone and you see their body when they’re dead, it’s clear that they’re not there.  So, whatever that essence is, energy, who knows what happens to that or where that goes.  So, maybe not, as Hugo says, the packaging, but there is some fabulous mystery and the cause and effect that happens in your life that you’re not aware of even how you affect people.

 

TOM:  What were the challenges of working with three directors, Lana and Andy Wachowski and Tom Tykwer? 

HUGO WEAVING:  In this instance, really, there was no challenge about working with Lana and Andy and Tom.  Lana and Andy are very sort of in-tune anyway.  And they had met Tom some time before they came up with this project, and they loved his films and admired him and met him, and they all got on so well they kept wanting to see each other.  And then they decided that they should probably one day do a film together, whatever that might be.

And then it was over another period of time talking about what that project would be.  Cloud Atlas came up and they read that and talked about that and got excited about that.  So, once the script had been written and they’d worked on that together and finally managed to raise all the money, they got the team together.

I’d worked with Lana and Andy before, but when I met Tom, I was on Skype and he sort of bounded into this frame and Lana and Andy were there and Tom bounded into the background.  The three of them are going, ‘Hi, Hugo,’  And I thought, these three are so in-tune and so well suited to being together.  And that was after a lengthy pre-production period.

They just seem to be extraordinarily, all incredibly well-prepared, highly intelligent, very open to each other, and great lovers of actors and film.  And they share very similar ideas about life.  So, it was really not a challenge working with any of them at all.

 

TOM:  What was it like working with their different directing styles?

HUGO WEAVING:  As an actor, you work with different directors all the time, and we were never on the same set.  There was only one day that I saw them on the same set, because Tom had a shutdown period for one day.  But they never had to direct altogether anyway.  They sorted it beforehand.

 

SUSAN SARANDON:  They wrote it together.  So, they were literally on the same page and they spent that time, I think, battling everything out ahead of time, and trying to understand exactly how to make that happen.  And they delight in each other.

 

HUGO WEAVING:  Yeah, they do.

SUSAN SARANDON:  And, actually, they celebrate each other.  There’s no sense of competition.  It’s really fantastic.

 

HUGO WEAVING:  It’s very joyous seeing them all together.  It’s great.  What I find remarkable is that they not only manage to make this one, but then, all were all together in the editing process.  Now, that’s more interesting.

I mean, I have talked to them about it and they said, ‘Look, to be honest, it was difficult and we had to lose some of the things we loved most,’ but I think they said they had maybe one day where it was problematic and they had to think.  But, it wasn’t to do with a clash of personalities; it was just a difficult decision that they had to make.  They’re very well suited to each other.  And they’re very giving, generous people.  But they’re no dummies.

 

SUSAN SARANDON:  And Tom did the music.  So, that contribution wouldn’t have been there if he hadn’t been there.

And the Wachowskis are in such an interesting place right now, and the difference between how things were directed during Speed Racer, which was a completely different kind of cartoon, very exacting kind of thing, I think that this was much looser and much more funny than that.

 

TOM:  The Wachowskis seem to have become more open to press with this film.  Do you have the sense that they’ve changed over the years that you’ve known them? 

HUGO WEAVING:  I have always found them wonderfully easy and joyous to be with.  From the moment I met them, we clicked and have laughed from that day on.  So, they’re very warm, smart, lovely people.

They’re just very shy and very protective of their privacy.  Some people find it very hard to be in this situation.  Talking to a vast audience or to a small group can be difficult.

 

SUSAN SARANDON:  Also, I think that what happens in this film subliminally, with the actors playing many different parts and with the stories being edited in a certain way and everything else, is that even though they don’t talk about it in the movie, subliminally what happens is this fluidity of gender and race and age and period.  Part of what happens is that you understand that this is everyone, no matter what the wrapping is, that that spirit of that person, the humanity, is what we all have in common.

I think it’s a gift to journalists that now is the time when they’re doing this, that they have something that is even bigger that has encouraged them to step out.  I mean, you’d have to talk to them about it, but it’s a very different kind of film with what they’ve asked the actors to do and what they’ve done, and the collaboration.  I think it’s just a very special moment in time where the work and the artists, they’re in a different place, and it’s a very brave thing for them to do it.

HUGO WEAVING:  Lots of changes have gone on.  But, fundamentally, these two people are of very much the same spirits that I first met the first day I met them years ago.  And they’re truly wonderful.

 

Cloud Atlas is released on the 28th of February